One of our wonderful tech’s has been looking into better ways to treat Demodex mites which he sees everyday on patient’s eyelashes under the microscope. He saw a presentation at ASCRS (the international cornea & cataract meeting) on the use of 1% Malathion Drops or Shampoo and 4% Pilogel for unwanted critters in hair areas.
He has done research on 1% Malathion Drops or Shampoo and 4% Pilogel and Neem Oil.
He has even offered to try using all of the above on his own eyes to be sure it is not painful or toxic.
So far I could not find any published studies to say these options kill Demodex effectively. 1% Malathion Drops or Shampoo and 4% Pilogel does appear to help with pubic lice or pediculosis which we do occasionally see in eyelashes. But I have never recommended this for Demodex as diluted tea tree oil usually works fine. Avenova works also with less burning but I find TTO is stronger & works more effectively.
Still we have patients who keep getting demodex which we believe blocks the orifice of the meibomian gland and leads to meibomian gland atrophy: are these other chemicals an option for the eye?
The only studies I could find on Neem Oil and the eye. The only potential serious side effect that can occur with Neem Oil, that I could find is toxic optic neuropathy if Neem Oil is ingested.
For now, we will wait to see if our Tech will really try these options on his eye first.
SLC
A rare case of toxic optic neuropathy secondary to consumption of neem oil
Copyright : © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
A 35-year-old female was referred to our hospital with bilateral loss of vision of two days duration. She gave history of consumption of about 150 ml of neem oil five days back. Examination revealed no perception of light in both eyes. Both pupils were dilated and sluggishly reacting to light. Her fundus examination showed bilateral hyperemic, edematous discs and also edema extending along the superior and inferior temporal vascular arcade. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showed bilateral putaminal regions with altered signal, hypointensities in T1-weighted images, hyperintensities on T2-weighted, images and hyperintense on Fluid Attenuation Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) images suggestive of cytotoxic edema due to tissue hypoxia. Her vision improved to 20/200 in both eyes with treatment after two months. This is the first case report of such nature in the literature to the best of our knowledge.
Keywords: Disc edema, neem oil, putamen, toxin-induced encephalopathy, Toxic Optic Neuropathy Secondary to Consumption of Neem Oil
Neem oil (also known as Margosa oil) is a deep yellow oil with an unpleasant taste and smell. It is an extract of the seed of the Neem tree (
Azadirachta indica A. Juss) a native tree of India but now widely distributed throughout Indo-Malaysia.[
1]
Consumption is usually accidental, rarely suicidal or may be due to nasal instillation for common cold in children as practiced in southern parts of India. Even small doses of neem oil are known to cause severe metabolic acidosis along with seizures which can be refractory with known late neurological sequelae.[
2] The diagnosis is based on patient history and neuro-ophthalmological findings.[
3]
We report a rare case of toxic optic neuropathy secondary to neem oil consumption associated with neurological manifestations.
Case Report
A 35-year-old female patient presented with bilateral visual loss of two days duration (on 16.12.2009) with history of consumption of about 150 ml neem oil five days back (12.12.2009) in an attempted suicide, for which she was taken to the nearby government hospital. She was admitted and treated with induced vomiting after about 2-3 hours of consumption. Patient was asymptomatic for about 48 h in the hospital. Later patient noticed sudden bilateral visual loss and was referred to us for further ophthalmic evaluation.
Ophthalmic examination revealed no perception of light in both eyes. Anterior segment examination revealed bilateral 6-mm, dilated and sluggishly reactive pupils. Rest of her anterior segment examination was normal. Her fundus examination showed bilateral, hyperemic and edematous discs with extension of edema along the superior and inferior temporal arcuate fibers for about 2-3 disc diopters from the disc margins. The veins around the disc were mildly dilated and tortuous [Fig. and ]. The rest of the vitreous, fundus examination revealed no abnormal findings. Neurological examination showed exaggerated deep tendon reflexes and an extensor bilateral plantar reflex.
Right Eye Fundus picture showing disc edema, venous tortuosity with extension of edema along the superior and inferior arcades for about 2-3 disc diopters from the disc margins
Left Eye Fundus picture showing disc edema, venous tortuosity with extension of edema along the superior and inferior temporal arcades for about 2-3 disc diopters from the disc margins
Complete hemogram was within normal limits, Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL ), HIV1 and 2 were non-reactive. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showed bilateral putaminal regions with altered signal, hypointensities in T1-weighted images, hyperintensities on T2-weighted images and hyperintense on Fluid Attenuation Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) images suggestive of cytotoxic edema due to tissue hypoxia [Fig. and ].
Bilateral putaminal regions showed altered signal hypointensities in T1W images
Hyperintensities on T2W images
Medical therapy was initiated which included methyl prednisolone 1 g intravenously (IV) for three days followed by oral prednisolone 50 mg /day for 11 days along with 1000 μg vitamin B12 (injection methyl cobalamin – 1000 μg intramuscularly) every five days for eight weeks.
Patient did not show any visual improvement after one week of treatment but pupillary reactions improved. During her subsequent follow-up after about 15 days her vision in both eyes improved to counting fingers 1/2 meters and at one month follow-up vision was 20/200 in both eyes and pupillary reactions were normal in both eyes. Her fundus examination showed reduced disc edema [Fig. and ]
Right Eye Fundus picture showing reduced disc edema
Left Eye Fundus picture showing reduced disc edema
At two months follow-up her vision remained 20/200 in both eyes and injection methyl cobalamin 1000 μg intramuscular was continued.
Discussion
Neem oil, also known as Margosa oil is obtained from the neem plant (
Azadirachta indica A. Juss). Neem oil is extracted from oil seed kernels. It contains neutral oils such as palmitic and stearic acids. The active ingredients are terpenoids such as azadirachtin, nimbin, picrin and sialin. It also contains aflatoxin, but in very low concentrations. Azadirachtin is attributed with the pesticide action of neem oil. It is used as an insecticide for arthropod pests.[
1]
Neem oil is used as a traditional medicine in India for various diseases like headache, gastrointestinal disorders, as a male contraceptive, menstrual disorders, asthma etc.
Neem oil poisoning causes vomiting which occurs within minutes to hours following ingestion of the oil. Drowsiness and tachypnea with acidotic respiration followed by recurrent generalized seizures are the other clinical features. The seizures are usually associated with loss of consciousness and coma.[
4]
In our case, patient had bilateral toxic optic neuropathy. Patient had consumed 150 ml of neem oil which had the following contents: Neem oil kernel extract in solvent methanol containing 0.15%, Azadirachtin – 60%, Emulsifier-5%, treated Neem oil – 35%.
No specific antidote is available. Gastric lavage is not recommended. Treatment is primarily symptomatic.[
5] She had bilateral toxic optic neuropathy with exaggerated deep tendon reflexes and extensor plantar reflex. MRI scan findings were suggestive of acute toxic encephalopathy and it can be considered as a possible etiology for bilateral toxic optic neuropathy.[
6] We treated her with injection IV methyl prednisolone 1 g per kg body weight for three days based on case reports on methanol poisoning.[
7]
Footnotes
Source of Support: Nil.
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
References
1.
Rahaman A, Talukder FA. Bio efficacy of some plant derivatives that protect grain against the pulse beetle.Callosobruchus maculates. J Chem Ecol. 1993;19:246–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2.
Dhongade RK, Kavade SG, Damle RS. Neem Oil Poisoning. Indian Pediatr. 2008;45:55–7. [PubMed]
3.
Halavaara J, Valanne L, Setala K. Neuroimaging supports the clinical diagnosis of methanol poisoning. Neuroradiology. 2002;44:924–8. [PubMed]
4.
Sinniah D, Baskaran G. Margosa oil poisoning as a cause of Reye’s Syndrome. Lancet. 1981;1:487–9.[PubMed]
5.
Lai SIM, Lim KW, Ching HK. Margosa Oil Poisoning as a cause of toxic encephalopathy. Singapore Med J. 1990;31:463–5. [PubMed]
6.
Dietemann JL, Botelho C, Nogueira T, Vargas MI, Audibert C, Abu Eid M, et al. Imaging in acute toxic encephalopathy. J Neuro radiol. 2004;31:313–26. [PubMed]
7.
Sodhi PK, Goyal JL, Mehta DK. Methanol-induced optic neuropathy: Treatment with intravenous high dose steroids. Int J clin pract. 2001;55:599–602. [PubMed]
There are some websites that say Neem Oil helps with Conjunctivitis but I have not seen any publications to say it works or is safe for meibomian glands or for the eyes.
On this site, a patient said Neem Oil made her worse: case of 1.
Emulsion of Chloramphenicol: an Overwhelming Approach for Ocular Delivery.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Ophthalmic formulations of chloramphenicol have poor bioavailability of chloramphenicol in the ocular cavity.
AIM:
The present study aimed at exploring the impact of different oil mixtures in the form of emulsion on the permeability of chloramphenicol after ocular application.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Selection of oil mixture and ratio of the components was made by an equilibrium solubility method. An emulsifier was chosen according to its emulsification properties. A constrained simplex centroid design was used for the assessment of the emulsion development. Emulsions were evaluated for physicochemical properties; zone of inhibition, in-vitro diffusion and ex-vivo local accumulation of chloramphenicol. Validation of the design using check-point batch and reduced polynomial equations were also developed. Optimization of the emulsion was developed by software Design® expert 6.0.8. Assessment of the osmolarity, ocular irritation, sterility testing and isotonicity of optimized batch were also made.
RESULTS:
Parker Neem®, olive and peppermint oils were selected as an oil phase in the ratio 63.64:20.2:16.16. PEG-400 was selected as an emulsifier according to a pseudo-ternary phase diagram. Constrained simplex-centroid design was applied in the range of 25-39% water, 55-69% PEG-400, 5-19% optimized oil mixture, and 1% chloramphenicol. Unpaired Student’s t-test showed for in-vitro and ex-vivo studies that there was a significant difference between the optimized batch of emulsion and Chloramphenicol eye caps (a commercial product) according to both were equally safe.
CONCLUSION:
The optimized batch of an emulsion of chloramphenicol was found to be as safe as and more effective than Chloramphenicol eye caps.