Electronic Medical Records are leading to record burn out rates among doctors: my 2 cents

Many of my friends are in the finance world. They have at least 4 screens all coordinated together with standing tables that lower at the touch of a button and super comfy chairs. Their screens are huge and sometimes have touch screen technology that allows them to move one graph to another screen and blow up images like you can with the iphone.

Surgeons and world class doctors alike have “crappy little screens where the EMR sucks”—my favorite quote. The ability to put in data and access the data is horrible. There are no search bars. The input screens are very user un-friendly.

For years I have yearned for Google to create a free EMR version as I know their coders would listen to doctors and fix the problem.

The below study points to the fact that most doctors really dislike their EMR and most of them are horrible.

JAMA OphthalmologyFebruary 8, 2018

Adoption of Electronic Health Records and Perceptions of Financial and Clinical Outcomes Among Ophthalmologists in the United States

Key Points
Question  What is the current electronic health record (EHR) adoption rate among ophthalmologists in the United States, and what is their perception of financial and clinical productivity following implementation?
Findings  In this population-based, cross-sectional survey, the adoption rate of EHRs among ophthalmologists was 72.1%. Ophthalmologists reported that their net revenues and productivity have declined and that practice costs are higher with EHR use.
Meaning  The EHR adoption rate has doubled since a previous EHR survey of American ophthalmologists in 2011, and in comparison with 2 previous EHR surveys, perceptions of practice costs and clinical productivity are more negative.

Importance  Assessing the rate of electronic health record (EHR) adoption and ophthalmologists’ perceptions on financial and clinical productivity is important in understanding how to direct future design and health care policy.
Objective  To assess adoption rate and perceptions of financial and clinical outcomes of EHRs among ophthalmologists in the United States.
Design, Setting, and Participants  Population-based, cross-sectional study. A random sample of 2000 ophthalmologists was generated on the basis of mailing address zip codes from the 2015 American Academy of Ophthalmology US active membership database, which included more than 18 000 ophthalmologists. A survey was sent by email to assess adoption rate of EHRs, perceptions of financial and clinical productivity, and engagement with Medicare and Medicaid programs that incentivize the use of EHRs. The survey was conducted between 2015 and 2016.
Main Outcomes and Measures  Adoption rate of EHRs and perceptions of financial and clinical productivity.
Results  The adoption rate of EHRs among surveyed ophthalmologists (348 respondents) was 72.1%. The responding ophthalmologists perceived that their net revenues and productivity have declined and that practice costs are higher with EHR use. Of those who attested for stage 1 of the EHR incentive program, 83% had already or were planning to attest to stage 2, but 9% had no plans.
Conclusions and Relevance  The adoption of EHRs by ophthalmologists has more than doubled since a 2011 survey and is similar to that of primary care physicians (79%). In comparison with 2 previous surveys of ophthalmologists, respondents had more negative perceptions of EHR productivity outcomes and effect on practice costs, although financial data were not collected in this survey to support these opinions. These negative perceptions suggest that more attention should be placed on improving the efficiency and usability of EHR systems.
Shopping Cart