Does the Intake of Hyaluronic acid by Mouth Help Dry Eyes?

Oral HA 240 mg (Innerb, Suheung, Ltd., Seoul, Korea) once daily was supplemented in the study group for 3 months. It does seem to help. I have 2 patients who say it has helped. It is over the counter and very safe. Looking for more studies. 

Clinical Study | Open Access
Volume 2019 |Article ID 5491626 | 5 pages

Oral Hyaluronic Acid Supplementation for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease: A Pilot Study

Academic Editor: Miguel Rechichi
Received23 May 2019
Accepted19 Aug 2019
Published25 Sep 2019


Purpose. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of oral hyaluronic acid (HA) in patients with dry eye disease (DED). Study Design. Prospective randomized controlled trial. Methods. This trial enrolled 54 subjects and they were randomized into the study or control group. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) >18 years of age; (2) distance best-corrected visual acuity ≥ 20/40 Snellen equivalent in each eye; (3) IOP ≤ 21 mmHg in both eyes; (4) ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score of ≥18 and <65; (5) <10 seconds of tear break up time (TBUT); (6) >5 corneal spots of corneal fluorescein staining (CFS); and (7) ≤ 10 mm/5 min of the Schirmer test. All subjects were treated with a topical HA, and the study group was supplemented with oral HA. OSDI, TBUT, CFS, and the Schirmer test were evaluated for ocular surface parameters. Results. 24 patients were assigned in the study group. Significant improvement of OSDI, TBUT, and CFS was observed at 1 month and 3 months after oral HA administration in the study group. At baseline and follow-up at 1 and 3 months, OSDI scores were 61.8 ± 16.2, 47.3 ± 11.6, and 42.3 ± 9.1, respectively (). TBUT was improved after treatment for 1 month and 3 months (4.2 ± 1.1;  and 4.7 ± 1.1; ). There were also statistically significant improvements in the CSF (1.8 ± 1.0, 0.8 ± 0.7; ) at baseline compared with those at 1 month. Conclusions. A combined supplement of both oral and topical HA more efficiently improves corneal epithelial wound healing and related symptoms than topical HA alone, in DED.

1. Introduction

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common chronic ocular surface disease which is characterized by a loss of tear film homeostasis. It has multifactorial causes including tear film instability, hyperosmolarity, inflammation, and neurosensory abnormalities and results in ocular discomfort and visual impairment [1].
The treatment of DED is generally initiated with an instillation of lubricant eye drops or viscosity-enhancing agents [2]. Other major treatment options include anti-inflammatory therapy, tear conservation approach, and the treatment of lid abnormality. Dietary modification such as essential fatty acid, [34] lactoferrin [5], and antioxidant supplement [6] is a minor treatment option; however, there is growing evidence that diet and nutritional supplementation play a role in DED.
Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a macromolecular mucopolysaccharide that is widely distributed throughout connective, epithelial, and neural tissues [7]. HA has been used in tear supplements to enhance lubrication as a topical agent, and it has been proven to promote corneal epithelial wound healing [89]. However, HA can also be supplemented in oral route. Recently, HA has been taken orally to reduce joint pain in osteoarthritic knees and increase hydration for dry skin. Studies have proven that oral HA has anti-inflammatory [10] and skin moisturizing properties [11]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no trial of oral HA supplementation for the treatment of DED. In this study, we assumed that anti-inflammatory and moisturizing effects of oral HA also might work in DED. We investigated the effect of oral HA supplementation for the treatment of DED.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects
This study was a single-center, nonblinded prospective randomized controlled trial. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital and conformed to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all patients and normal control subjects.
A total of 54 consecutive subjects were enrolled from the outpatient department from March 2016 to July 2016. The eyes of the subjects were randomized into the study or control group. The inclusion criteria for this study were as follows: (1) >18 years of age; (2) distance best-corrected visual acuity ≥20/40 Snellen equivalent in each eye; (3) IOP ≤ 21 mmHg in both eyes; (4) ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score of ≥18 and <65; (5) <10 seconds of tear break up time (TBUT); [12] (6) >5 corneal spots of corneal fluorescein staining (CFS); [13] (7) ≤10 mm/5 min of the Schirmer test. Patients with any other ocular diseases except DED or ocular injury were excluded from the study. Patients having ocular surgery or on topical lubricants during the previous 6 months were also excluded.
2.2. Topical Lubricant and Oral HA Supplementation
A topical lubricant of 0.15% HA ophthalmic suspension (New Hyaluni ophthalmic solution 0.15%, Taejoon, Ltd., Seoul, Korea) was allowed to both study and control group in each eye 5-6 times daily.
Oral HA 240 mg (Innerb, Suheung, Ltd., Seoul, Korea) once daily was supplemented in the study group for 3 months. It is reported that the physical properties and physiological activities of HA differ depending on its molecular weights. [14] In this study, 390 kDa of sodium hyaluronate was used.
2.3. Ocular Surface Parameters
Symptom assessment was performed using OSDI (Allergan, Irvine, Inc., Irvine, CA) [15], which evaluates symptoms of ocular discomfort, effects on visual function, and the impact of environmental triggers.
TBUT was measured using a fluorescein strip (fluorescein paper, Haag-Streit AG, Köniz, Switzerland). The fluorescein strip was moistened with one drop of saline and inserted into the lateral inferior fornix. The patient was asked to blink several times. Then the tear film was observed under the cobalt blue illumination of the slit lamp. The time between the last blink and the first dry spot on the cornea was taken to be the TBUT. The average TBUT of 3 repeated measurements was recorded for each eye.
Following the TBUT measurement, CFS was evaluated. Corneal staining was examined at the slit lamp using cobalt blue illumination and a Wratten 12 yellow barrier filter. The degree of corneal staining was assessed with the 5-point Oxford scale [16].
The Schirmer test was performed, without topical anesthesia, as a measure of basal tear production. A Schirmer strip (Colorbar, Inc., Eagle Vision, Memphis, TN) was folded from the edge and placed in the lateral third of the lower lid. The patients were instructed to close their eyes. The strip wetting was recorded after 5 minutes in millimeters, and a reading of less than 10 mm was considered abnormal.
2.4. Outcome Measures
OSDI, TBUT, CSF, and the Schirmer test (without anesthesia) were performed at baseline; then OSDI, TBUT, and CSF were undergone at 1 and 3 months after intervention. Primary outcomes were a mean change of OSDI, TBUT, and CSF between baseline and 1 month after treatment. Secondary outcomes were the mean change from 1 month to 3 months after treatment. Both eyes were evaluated, but only one eye with the worst score at the initial enrollment was included in the analyses.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
A Mann–Whitney U test was conducted to compare the measurements between the study and control group. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare changes in ocular surface parameters at baseline and 1 and 3 months after treatment.
SPSS 15.0 statistical software for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for all statistical analyses. A two-sided test with a value of  was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

Twenty-four patients (6 males and 18 females) and thirty patients (8 males and 22 females) were assigned in the study and control groups, respectively. The mean patient age was 48.6 ± 13.0 in the study group and 53.29 ± 10.8 in the control group (). The average of the Schirmer test, TBUT, CSF, and OSDI score at baseline are shown in Table 1. The parameters were not different significantly between the study and control group.

Study group (topical + oral HA) Control group (topical HA)  value

Number of patients 24 30
Age 48.6 ± 13.0 53.29 ± 10.8 0.073
Gender (% female) 75 76 0.755
Schirmer test (mm/5 min) 4.5 ± 1.0 4.9 ± 1.9 0.486
TBUT (sec) 3.3 ± 1.1 3.8 ± 1.5 0.104
CSF (Oxford score) 1.8 ± 1.0 1.5 ± 0.6 0.445
OSDI (score/100) 61.8 ± 16.2 62.5 ± 17.2 0.658

TBUT = tear break up time; CSF = corneal fluorescein staining; OSDI = ocular surface disease index. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.  value was tested by the Mann–Whitney U test.
3.1. Primary Outcome
One month after treatment, OSDI was significantly improved in both study group (1 month; 47.3 ± 11.6, ) and control group (1 month; 53.1 ± 11.4, ), (Figure 1). However, TBUT was significantly improved in the study group (1 month; 4.2 ± 1.1, ) but not in the control group (1 month; 4.4 ± 1.4, ), (Figure 2). CFS was also significantly improved in the study group (1 month; 0.8 ± 0.7, ) but not in the control group (1 month; 1.3 ± 0.6, ) (Figure 3). The between-group difference in CSF at 1 month was significant (), but the differences in TBUT and OSDI were not significant ( and , respectively).
3.2. Secondary Outcome
Three months after treatment, OSDI was significantly improved when compared to one month after treatment in the study group (3 months; 42.3 ± 9.1, ) but not in the control group (3 months; 49.0 ± 17.6, ) (Figure 1). TBUT was also significantly improved in the study group (3 months; 4.7 ± 1.1, ) but not in the control group (3 months; 4.9 ± 1.1, ) (Figure 2). However, CFS was also significantly improved in both study group (3 months; 0.3 ± 0.4, ) and control group (3 months; 0.8 ± 0.5, ) (Figure 3). The between-group differences in CFS and OSDI at 3 months were significant ( and , respectively) but the difference in TBUT was not significant ().

4. Discussion

In this study, we investigated the effect of oral HA supplementation for the treatment of DED. Combined oral and topical HA treated group showed significant improvement of CFS at 1 and 3 months. Otherwise, topical HA alone treated group showed significant improvement of CFS only at 3 months. The difference of CFS at 3 months between two groups was significant (, via the Mann–Whitney U test). In addition, OSDI was also significantly improved continually at 1 and 3 months after treatment in oral and topical HA supplemented group. However, topical HA alone treated group showed significant OSDI improvement at 1 month but not at 3 months. The difference of OSDI at 3 months between groups was also significant (, via the Mann–Whitney U test). These results suggest that the combined supplement of both oral and topical HA more efficiently improves corneal epithelial wound healing and related symptoms than topical HA alone, in DED.
HA is a high molecular weight polysaccharide composed of repeating polymeric disaccharides of D-glucuronic acid and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. Orally administered HA is degraded by intestinal bacteria and absorbed through the intestinal route. Though there are no digestive enzymes to degrade HA, hyaluronidase-producing bacteria including Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium perfringens reside in the human intestine as a normal flora [1719]. Balogh et al. [20] investigated the absorption of oral HA using radioactively labeled material in animal models and presented that approximately 90% of ingested HA was absorbed into and used by the body. In that study, they also showed that orally administered high molecular weight HA was also transferred into tissues without depolymerization through lymphatic uptake. Osami et al. [21] evaluated the effect of oral consumption of HA for dry skin using a skin surface analyser and reported that moisture content at a lower part of the eye significantly improved from 3 weeks to 6 weeks of ingestion compared to the placebo control group. This result implies that ingested HA was distributed at the ocular area.
Oral administration of high molecular weight HA modulates Th-1-associated inflammation [10]. The presence of CD4+ T cells at the ocular surface in DED and the improvement of surface inflammation with topical cyclosporine, which is a T-cell activity lowering agent, proposed a role for adaptive immunity in DED [22]. There is a growing body of evidence supporting the pathogenicity of CD4+ T cells in DED [2324]. Asari et al. [10] orally administered high molecular weight HA to MRL-lpr/lpr mice, a Th-1-type autoimmune disease model. In that study, cytokine array analysis showed the enhancement of interleukin-10 production and anti-inflammatory cytokine. DNA array analysis showed the upregulation of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) expression and the downregulation of pleiotrophin expression. These results suggest that the oral administration of high molecular HA may modulate Th-1-type autoimmune disease and inflammation.
HA promotes corneal epithelial wound healing. HA as well as its degradation products are capable of activating specific intracellular responses including epithelial cell proliferation, cell apoptosis, and neovascularization [25]. It is widely accepted that one of the key mediators for leading HA-associated cell activation is CD44. HA is a ligand for CD44 which is a multifunctional cell surface adhesion receptor. CD44 is ubiquitously expressed throughout the body [26] and also found on human corneas [27]. Studies have shown that CD44 upregulation associated with a proliferation of epithelial cells and migration [2829].
The present findings, however, should be interpreted taking into account the limitations of the study, particularly the small sample size and pilot characteristics of the trial. To ensure the results, further investigation with a larger sample size including double-blind placebo controlled group and experiments to clarify the underlying mechanisms are needed.
In conclusion, the concomitant supplement of both oral and topical HA more efficiently improves corneal epithelial wound healing and provides symptomatic relief than the topical administration of HA alone in DED.

Data Availability

Data supporting this research article are available from the corresponding author upon request.


The sponsor or the funding organisation had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


This study was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017R1A1A1A05001051) and the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.


  1. J. P. Craig, K. K. Nichols, E. K. Akpek et al., “TFOS DEWS II definition and classification report,” The Ocular Surface, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 276–283, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. L. Jones, L. E. Downie, D. Korb et al., “TFOS DEWS II management and therapy report,” The Ocular Surface, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 575–628, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. T. Epitropoulos, E. D. Donnenfeld, Z. A. Shah et al., “Effect of oral re-esterified omega-3 nutritional supplementation on dry eyes,” Cornea, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1185–1191, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. A. Deinema, A. J. Vingrys, C. Y. Wong, D. C. Jackson, H. R. Chinnery, and L. E. Downie, “A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial of two forms of omega-3 supplements for treating dry eye disease,” Ophthalmology, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Devendra and S. Singh, “Effect of oral lactoferrin on cataract surgery induced dry eye: a randomised controlled trial,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 9, pp. NC06–NC09, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. K. Blades, S. Patel, and K. E. Aidoo, “Oral antioxidant therapy for marginal dry eye,” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 589–597, 2001.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. T. C. Laurent and J. R. Fraser, “Hyaluronan,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 2397–2404, 1992.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. W.-T. Ho, T.-H. Chiang, S.-W. Chang, Y.-H. Chen, F.-R. Hu, and I.-J. Wang, “Enhanced corneal wound healing with hyaluronic acid and high-potassium artificial tears,” Clinical and Experimental Optometry, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 536–541, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. G. Camillieri, C. Bucolo, S. Rossi, and F. Drago, “Hyaluronan-induced stimulation of corneal wound healing is a pure pharmacological effect,” Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 548–553, 2004.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. Asari, T. Kanemitsu, and H. Kurihara, “Oral administration of high molecular weight hyaluronan (900 kDa) controls immune system via Toll-like receptor 4 in the intestinal epithelium,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 32, pp. 24751–24758, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. R. M. Greco, J. A. Iocono, and H. P. Ehrlich, “Hyaluronic acid stimulates human fibroblast proliferation within a collagen matrix,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 177, no. 3, pp. 465–473, 1998.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. A. Lemp and J. R. Hamill Jr., “Factors affecting tear film breakup in normal eyes,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 103–105, 1973.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. P. Whitcher, C. H. Shiboski, S. C. Shiboski et al., “A simplified quantitative method for assessing keratoconjunctivitis sicca from the sjögren’s syndrome international registry,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 405–415, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. R. Stern, A. Asari, and K. Sugahara, “Hyaluronan fragments: an information-rich system,” European Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 85, no. 8, pp. 699–715, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. M. Schiffman, M. D. Christianson, G. Jacobsen, J. D. Hirsch, and B. L. Reis, “Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. 615–621, 2000.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. J. Bron, V. E. Evans, and J. A. Smith, “Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests,” Cornea, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 640–650, 2003.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. R. C. Jones, J. Deck, R. D. Edmondson, and M. E. Hart, “Relative quantitative comparisons of the extracellular protein profiles of Staphylococcus aureus UAMS-1 and its sarA, agr, and sarA agr regulatory mutants using one-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and nanocapillary liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 190, no. 15, pp. 5265–5278, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. T. Shimizu, K. Ohtani, H. Hirakawa et al., “Complete genome sequence of Clostridium perfringens, an anaerobic flesh-eater,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 996–1001, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Kimura, T. Maeshima, T. Kubota, H. Kurihara, Y. Masuda, and Y. Nomura, “Absorption of orally administered hyaluronan,” Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1172–1179, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. L. Balogh, A. Polyak, D. Mathe et al., “Absorption, uptake and tissue affinity of high-molecular-weight hyaluronan after oral administration in rats and dogs,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 56, no. 22, pp. 10582–10593, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. Osami, O. Wataru, S. Wakako, Y. Kazuya, and T. Takeo, “Clinical effects of hyaluronic acid diet for dry skin-objective evaluation with microscopic skin surface analyzer,” Journal of New Remedies & Clinics, vol. 50, pp. 548–560, 2001.View at: Google Scholar
  22. K. S. Kunert, A. S. Tisdale, M. E. Stern, J. A. Smith, and I. K. Gipson, “Analysis of topical cyclosporine treatment of patients with dry eye syndrome: effect on conjunctival lymphocytes,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 118, no. 11, pp. 1489–1496, 2000.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. K. Chauhan, J. El Annan, T. Ecoiffier et al., “Autoimmunity in dry eye is due to resistance of Th17 to Treg suppression,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 182, no. 3, pp. 1247–1252, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. Y. Niederkorn, M. E. Stern, S. C. Pflugfelder et al., “Desiccating stress induces T cell-mediated Sjogren’s syndrome-like lacrimal keratoconjunctivitis,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 7, pp. 3950–3957, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. Zhong, Y. Deng, B. Tian et al., “Hyaluronate acid-dependent protection and enhanced corneal wound healing against oxidative damage in corneal epithelial cells,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2016, Article ID 6538051, 10 pages, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. L. T. Senbanjo and M. A. Chellaiah, “CD44: a multifunctional cell surface adhesion receptor is a regulator of progression and metastasis of cancer cells,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 5, p. 18, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. N. Zhu, B. Nölle, and G. Duncker, “Expression of adhesion molecule CD44 on human corneas,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 80–84, 1997.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. S. Lee, S. U. Lee, C. Y. Che, and J. E. Lee, “Comparison of cytotoxicity and wound healing effect of carboxymethylcellulose and hyaluronic acid on human corneal epithelial cells,” International Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 215–221, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. A. Gomes, R. Amankwah, A. Powell-Richards, and H. S. Dua, “Sodium hyaluronate (hyaluronic acid) promotes migration of human corneal epithelial cells in vitro,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 821–825, 2004.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Copyright © 2019 Yeseul Kim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Shopping Cart